On 23 March 2011 20:58, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Improve user-defined-aggregates documentation.
>
> On closer inspection, that two-element initcond value seems to have been
> a little white lie to avoid explaining the full behavior of float8_accum.
> But if people are going to expect the examples to be exactly correct,
> I suppose we'd better explain. Per comment from Thom Brown.
>
> Branch
> ------
> REL9_0_STABLE
>
> Details
> -------
> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/03c77337209f0b2b3059d6ee9df2f94c6f66d910
>
> Modified Files
> --------------
> doc/src/sgml/xaggr.sgml | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Thanks Mr Lane :)
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company