Re: PQprepare question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Gregory Stark
Тема
Re: PQprepare question
Дата
в 10:32:36
Msg-id
87ps571o61.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
PQprepare question Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Re: PQprepare question Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PQprepare question Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Re: PQprepare question Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PQprepare question Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Re: PQprepare question Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
"Tom Lane"  writes:

> Michael Meskes  writes:
>> According to the docs parameters are referenced as $1, $2, and so. Is
>> there a reason not to use "?" as placeholder?
>
> It's an operator name.

Most drivers such as JDBC and DBD::Pg do allow you to use ? parameters because
they're the ODBC standard. But they're just replacing them with $1 and so on
behind your back. If you want your code to be portable to other databases then
it makes sense to use ? 

But otherwise there are a few advantages to using $1, $2... a) You can change
your query to possibly use the arguments in a different order without having
to change the execute parameters as well. b) You can use a parameter multiple
times in a query without having to burden your execute call site with multiple
copies of the parameter.

I think you lose if you have an operator ? and want to use these drivers
though. Even if you only use $n parameters the driver may still get confused.
(At the very least if you ever have a query with no parameters and a ?
operator in it). 

--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PQexecParams and IN query?
От: Michael Meskes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PQprepare question
FAQ