Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8
От
Neil Conway
Тема
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8
Дата
Msg-id
87n0pbnzmi.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Ответ на
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 (Peter Eisentraut)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Marcel Grünauer <marcel@uptime.at>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 "joel w. reed" <jreed@ddiworld.com>
Peter Eisentraut writes: > The HAS_CRYPT_R is true because the function is available even without the > prototype, but the struct is not. A plain bug in Perl's configury > mechanism. Yeah, that's true. The question is whether it's worth working around the bug. IMHO, yes -- but what do other people think? -- Neil Conway || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
