Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count

On 2/22/23 8:39 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 17 Dec 2022, at 04:27, Michael Paquier  wrote:
>>

>> Superuser-only GUCs should be documented as such, or do you intend to
>> make it user-settable like I suggested upthread :) ?
> 
> I don't really have strong feelings, so I reverted to being user-settable since
> I can't really present a strong argument for superuser-only.

I was going to present some weak arguments, but not worth it. Anything 
around using up CPU cycles would be true of just writing plain old queries.

> The attached is a rebase on top of master with no other additional hacking done
> on top of the above review comments.

Generally LGTM. I read through earlier comments (sorry I missed 
replying) and have nothing to add or object to.

Jonathan