On 2021-01-30 22:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Committed with your update, thanks.
>
> Hmm, shouldn't there have been a catversion bump in there?
I suppose yes on the grounds that it introduces something new in a
freshly initdb-ed database. But I thought it wasn't necessary because
there is no dependency between the binaries and the on-disk state.
There has already been another catversion change since, so it's no
longer relevant.
--
Peter Eisentraut
2ndQuadrant, an EDB company
https://www.2ndquadrant.com/