Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID)
Дата
Msg-id 6041.1023640529@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead,  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Ответы Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead,  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> Agreed on all accounts ... which is why this time, I want to do a proper
> branch when beta starts ... hell, from what I've seen suggested here so
> far, we have no choice ... At least then we can 'rip out' something from
> the beta tree without having to remove and re-add it to the development
> one later, hoping that they're changes haven't been affected by someone
> else's ...

Well, let's give that a try and see how it goes.  I'm a bit worried
about the amount of double-patching we'll have to do, but other projects
seem to manage to cope with multiple active branches...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Timestamp/Interval proposals: Part 2
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tuplesort: unexpected end of data