Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Дата
Msg-id
58cd047c-deba-0863-b279-56b931237176@2ndquadrant.com
Ответ на
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered (Noah Misch)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
parallel.c is not marked as test covered Clément Prévost <prevostclement@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Clément Prévost <prevostclement@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Clément Prévost <prevostclement@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
On 6/7/16 11:43 PM, Noah Misch wrote: > I changed this to keep the main message while overwriting the CONTEXT; a bug > in this area could very well produce some other error rather than no error. Regarding the patch that ended up being committed, I wonder if it is intentional that PL/pgSQL overwrites the context from the parallel worker. Shouldn't the context effectively look like ERROR: message CONTEXT: parallel worker CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function Elsewhere in this thread I suggested getting rid of the parallel worker context by default (except for debugging), but if we do want to keep it, then it seems to be a bug that a PL/pgSQL function can just eliminate it. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Robert Haas
Дата: