Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
От
Josh berkus
Тема
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Дата
Msg-id
57310E02.4090904@agliodbs.com
Список
Дерево обсуждения
9.6 -> 10.0 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Jonathan Katz <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com>
Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
On 05/09/2016 03:18 PM, Darren Duncan wrote: > Loosely speaking, have at least MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH.MATURITY components, > optionally more. MAJOR must be increased when a backwards-compatibility > break is made of any kind (such as removing a feature), otherwise MINOR > must be increased for any forwards-compatibility break (such as adding a > feature), otherwise PATCH must be increased for changes that shouldn't > break any kind of compatibility, except for fixing bugs or security > holes where the old behavior was not being relied on for any working > uses. MATURITY means eg alpha/beta/rc/production etc. That seems like that would be an argument against 10.0? Since we didn't break backwards compat? -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own)
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления
