Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump
files
Дата
Msg-id
57053F8D.4050409@gmx.net
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump
files Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump
files Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump
files Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump
files Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
On 04/05/2016 09:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Michael Paquier >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> Given the lack of any other complaints about this, I'm okay with the >>>> approach as presented. (I haven't read the patch in detail, though.) >>> >>> FWIW, I am still of the opinion that the last patch sent by Peter is >>> in a pretty good shape. >> >> Great. I've marked this patch as "Ready for Committer" in the >> CommitFest application. > > Peter, are you going to commit this? Feature freeze is in just a few days. done
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления