On 3/1/16 10:05 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
> Fair point, that means inventing a whole new OID generation structure..
Generation is just the tip of the iceberg. You still need the equivalent
to foreign keys (ie: pg_depend). While you would never have a permanent
object depend on a temp object, the reverse certainly needs to be supported.
If I were attempting to solve this at a SQL level, I'd be thinking about
using table inheritance such that the permanent objects are stored in a
permanent parent. New backends would create UNLOGGED children off of
that parent. There would be a pid column that was always NULL in the
parent, but populated in children. That means children could use their
own local form of an OID. When a backend terminates you'd just truncate
all it's tables.
Actually translating that into relcache and everything else would be a
serious amount of work.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com