Re: Anonymous code block with parameters
От
Hannu Krosing
Тема
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters
Дата
Msg-id
541B3D9E.4090803@2ndQuadrant.com
Ответ на
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters (Pavel Stehule)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Anonymous code block with parameters Kalyanov Dmitry <kalyanov.dmitry@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Anonymous code block with parameters Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
On 09/18/2014 02:37 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > if we would to need a "single use" function, then we should to > implement it, and we should not to rape some different objects. Some, > what has behave like function should be function. > > After some thinking, probably CTE design can be only one frame, where > we can do it > > WITH > FUNCTION f1(a int) RETURNS int AS $$ .. $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql, > FUNCTION f2(a int) RETURNS SETOF int AS $$ .. $$ LANGUAGE > plpgsql, > SELECT f1(x) FROM f2(z) LATERAL .... > > We can generalize WITH clause, so there SEQENCES, VIEWS, .. can be > defined for "single usage" +2 I just proposed the same thing in another branch of this discussion before reading this :) I guess it proves (a little) that WITH is the right place to do these kind of things ... Cheers -- Hannu Krosing PostgreSQL Consultant Performance, Scalability and High Availability 2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления