Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka)
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka)
Дата
Msg-id
53F64B83.2060900@gmx.net
Ответ на
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka) (Fabien COELHO)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
need xmllint on borka Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: need xmllint on borka Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: need xmllint on borka Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: need xmllint on borka Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka) Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on
borka) Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on
borka) Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on
borka) Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on borka) Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: run xmllint during build (was Re: need xmllint on
borka) Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: need xmllint on borka Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: need xmllint on borka Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
On 8/21/14 5:12 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > However, it seems that it is not run for target "html", nor for pdf/ps > targets. I'm wondering whether it is an oversight or if there is a > reason for that. Maybe the intention is that an explicit "htmlhelp" is > expected to do the checking, but then why force it for man and epub? It > seems to me that it is not consistent. It is only run when the build is via XML/XSLT, not via SGML/DSSSL (because the SGML/DSSSL build already checks the validity anyway).
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата: