Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers
От
Josh Berkus
Тема
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers
Дата
Msg-id
538680F4.1070501@agliodbs.com
Список
Дерево обсуждения
NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers John Melesky <john.melesky@rentrakmail.com>
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
Re: NFS, file system cache and shared_buffers Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
>> Why would they implement their own client? Did they have to do something special in their client to >> make it safe? > > I think it is mostly a performance issue. Each backend mounts its own copy > of the data files it needs. I personally would never put PostgreSQL on an NFS share on Linux. Unless things have changed radically in the last couple years, Linux's NFS code is flaky and unreliable, including flat-out lying about whether stuff has been sent and received or not. This is why NetApp's NFS servers came with their own, proprietary, Linux kernel module. NFS on Solaris/Illumos is a different story. Not sure about FreeBSD. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления