Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control rollback behavior on error
От
Inoue, Hiroshi
Тема
Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control rollback
behavior on error
Дата
Msg-id
5334F22F.1030004@tpf.co.jp
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control rollback
behavior on error "Inoue, Hiroshi" <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control
rollback behavior on error Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control rollback
behavior on error Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control
rollback behavior on error Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control rollback
behavior on error Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control
rollback behavior on error Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
(2014/03/27 20:55), Michael Paquier wrote: > (Moving back this thread to pgsql-odbc, so keeping a maximum of message history) As for the patch in the original post, Is there any difference between rollback_on_error and rollback_error_value except the naming? The length of connection strings seem to be increased at least 3 bytes. Is it right? regards, Hiroshi Inoue -- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter. SPAMfighter has removed 7015 of my spam emails to date. Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления