Re: use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6
От
Inoue, Hiroshi
Тема
Re: use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6
Дата
Msg-id
52A660E2.8060709@tpf.co.jp
Ответ на
use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6 (Pavel Raiskup)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6 Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>
Re: use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6 "Inoue, Hiroshi" <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Hi Pavel, (2013/12/06 19:58), Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hi, our regular package checking discovered that in postgresql-odbc is > using inet_addr() call (which is not ipv6 compliant). I tried to look at > it and it was used just for parsing of ipv4 addresses. It is not a big > deal (the worst thing what can happen is that ipv6 addresses will cost a > little bit more time to be resolved). > > Better solution would be imo to use inet_pton() call for both ipv4 and > ipv6 address families. Patch is attached, any comment is welcome! Thanks for the patch. I will take care of it. regards, Hiroshi Inoue -- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter. SPAMfighter has removed 1069 of my spam emails to date. Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления