Re: use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Inoue, Hiroshi
Тема
Re: use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6
Дата
Msg-id
52A660E2.8060709@tpf.co.jp
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6 Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>
Re: use inet_pton() instead of inet_addr() for ipv4/6 "Inoue, Hiroshi" <inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Hi Pavel,

(2013/12/06 19:58), Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi, our regular package checking discovered that in postgresql-odbc is
> using inet_addr() call (which is not ipv6 compliant).  I tried to look at
> it and it was used just for parsing of ipv4 addresses.  It is not a big
> deal (the worst thing what can happen is that ipv6 addresses will cost a
> little bit more time to be resolved).
>
> Better solution would be imo to use inet_pton() call for both ipv4 and
> ipv6 address families.  Patch is attached, any comment is welcome!

Thanks for the patch.
I will take care of it.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue




-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 1069 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan 
http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen


В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления
От: Inoue, Hiroshi
Дата:
От: Pavel Raiskup
Дата:
FAQ