Re: Libpq question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
John Townsend
Тема
Re: Libpq question
Дата
в 16:53:12
Msg-id
4FB94B86.4000907@advancedformulas.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Libpq question Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz>
Re: Libpq question Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
By by-passing the "dll" (or "so" on Linux) library I mean you write 
function or procedure calls to the server that is running as a service 
on Windows. You don't use the library with its 160 exported functions. 
You connect directly to the server thus saving one layer of protocols.  
To do this, you have to translate all the c functions you need (not just 
the headers or ".h" files) into pascal. Not a trivial task!

Would it be worth it? Depends, but for most situations would not give 
you more speed. With FPC comes a nice utility called h2pas.exe that does 
a decent job and can save you a lot of time. You still have to clean 
some translations.

Look at the *.c & *.h \src\interfaces\libpq directory that comes with 
the postgres source.

John


On 5/20/2012 7:51 AM, zeljko wrote:
> John Townsend wrote:
>
>> It appears that some developers (Davart) are by-passing the standard
>> client library, “libpq.dll”, and directly accessing the server using
>> Delphi or FPC. I am not sure of the advantage here. All libpq.dll
> I'm FPC user and I use libpq.so(.dll,.dylib) via zeoslib.
> Those who bypass libpq probably uses odbc connections or similar.
>
> zeljko
>
>

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: c k
Дата:
Сообщение: losing schema name in pg_dump
От: John R Pierce
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Libpq question
FAQ