Re: Query planner doesn't use index scan on tsvector GIN index if LIMIT is specifiedQuery planner doesn't use index scan on tsvector GIN index if LIMIT is specified
От
Jesper Krogh
Тема
Re: Query planner doesn't use index scan on tsvector GIN
index if LIMIT is specifiedQuery planner doesn't use index scan on tsvector
GIN index if LIMIT is specified
Дата
Msg-id
4F0CB0CB.7090101@krogh.cc
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Query planner doesn't use index scan on tsvector GIN
index if LIMIT is specifiedQuery planner doesn't use index scan on tsvector
GIN index if LIMIT is specified Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
On 2012-01-10 18:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> darklow writes:
>> But the performance problems starts when i do the same query specifying
>> LIMIT.
>> *SELECT id FROM cache WHERE tsv @@ to_tsquery('test:*') limit 20;*
>> By some reason index is not used.
> It apparently thinks there are enough matches that it might as well just
> seqscan the table and expect to find some matches at random, in less
> time than using the index would take.
>
> The estimate seems to be off quite a bit, so maybe raising the stats
> target for this column would help.
The cost of matching ts_match_vq against a toasted column
is not calculated correctly. This is completely parallel with
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-11/msg01754.php
Try raising the cost for ts_match_vq(tsvector,tsquery) that help a bit, but
its hard to get the cost high enough.
Raising statistics target helps too..
--
Jesper
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления