Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
От
Heikki Linnakangas
Тема
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
on both win32 and Unix
Дата
Msg-id
4E0C2C89.8060304@enterprisedb.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
on both win32 and Unix Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
on both win32 and Unix Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
on both win32 and Unix Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
on both win32 and Unix Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
on both win32 and Unix Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
on both win32 and Unix Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
on both win32 and Unix Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
on both win32 and Unix Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
on both win32 and Unix Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death
on both win32 and Unix Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
both win32 and Unix Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32
and Unix Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
On 30.06.2011 09:36, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> Attached is patch that addresses Fujii's third and most recent set of concerns. > > Thanks for updating the patch! > >> I think that Heikki is currently taking another look at my work, >> because he indicates in a new message to the list a short time ago >> that while reviewing my patch, he realised that there may be an >> independent problem with silent_mode. I will wait for his remarks >> before producing another version of the patch that incorporates those >> two small changes. > > Yes, we should wait for the comments from Heikki. But, I have another > comments; Here's a WIP patch with some mostly cosmetic changes I've done this far. I haven't tested the Windows code at all yet. It seems that no-one is objecting to removing silent_mode altogether, so I'm going to do that before committing this patch. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Yeb Havinga
Дата: