Re: Replication: slave is in permanent startup 'recovery'
От
Tomas Vondra
Тема
Re: Replication: slave is in permanent startup 'recovery'
Дата
Msg-id
4DA606BC.8060905@fuzzy.cz
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Replication: slave is in permanent startup 'recovery' "Henry C." <henka@cityweb.co.za>
Re: Replication: slave is in permanent startup
'recovery' "Henry C." <henka@cityweb.co.za>
Re: Replication: slave is in permanent startup 'recovery' Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Re: Replication: slave is in permanent startup 'recovery' Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
Re: Replication: slave is in permanent startup 'recovery' Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Re: Replication: slave is in permanent startup
'recovery' "Henry C." <henka@cityweb.co.za>
Re: Replication: slave is in permanent startup
'recovery' "Henry C." <henka@cityweb.co.za>
Re: Replication: slave is in permanent startup
'recovery' "Henry C." <henka@cityweb.co.za>
Dne 13.4.2011 20:42, Henry C. napsal(a): > > Forgot to mention recovery.conf on slave: > > standby_mode = 'on' > primary_conninfo = 'host..." > restore_command = 'cp /home/psql-wal-archive/%f "%p"' > archive_cleanup_command = 'pg_archivecleanup /home/psql-wal-archive %r' > > > The wiki states "If wal_keep_segments is a high enough number to retain the > WAL segments required for the standby server, this [restore_command] may not > be necessary." > > Presumably this is referring to wal_keep_segments config on the master, right? Right. If there are enough WAL segments on the master, the standby may ask for them and the data will be streamed to the standby. So the archive mode is not a requirement, although if you already use WAL archiving, it's a good idea to use it (no additional overhead on the primary etc.). regards Tomas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления