Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet
От
Heikki Linnakangas
Тема
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet
Дата
Msg-id
4C866B7A.5000006@enterprisedb.com
Ответ на
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet (Teodor Sigaev)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
patch: tsearch - some memory diet Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
On 07/09/10 19:27, Teodor Sigaev wrote: >> on 32bit from 27MB (3399 blocks) to 13MB (1564 blocks) >> on 64bit from 55MB to cca 27MB. > > Good results. But, I think, there are more places in ispell to use > hold_memory(): > - affixes and affix tree > - regis (REGex for ISpell, regis.c) A more general solution would be to have a new MemoryContext implementation that does the same your patch does. Ie. instead of tracking each allocation, just allocate a big chunk, and have palloc() return the next n free bytes from it, like a stack. pfree() would obviously not work, but wholesale MemoryContextDelete of the whole memory context would. I remember I actually tried this years ago, trying to reduce the overhead of parsing IIRC. The parser also does a lot of small allocations that are not individually pfree'd. And I think it helped a tiny bit, but I didn't pursue it further. But if there's many places where it would help, then it might well be worth it. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления