Re: Re: toast by chunk-end (was Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION 5 - time for change)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zdenek Kotala
Тема Re: Re: toast by chunk-end (was Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION 5 - time for change)
Дата
Msg-id 4922E8F4.7070906@sun.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: toast by chunk-end (was Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION 5 - time for change)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> 
>> If I'm thinking more, it is not probably CATALOG_VERSION_NO as well. 
>> Because toast table is created on demand. It is not in BKI.
> 
> It's not catversion in the sense that there's no catalog change, but it
> certainly requires a catversion bump due to internal changes.
> Otherwise, developers who have working data directories today will see
> weird errors when they update to a CVS version after this commit.
> 

I understand it but from upgrade point of view it is confusing. When you upgrade 
catalog then you catalog will not correspond with toast table structure and 
there is no clue if toast table is or is not already converted or which toast 
table structure is used.
    Zdenek


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1197)
Следующее
От: "Pavel Stehule"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: is any reason why only one columns subselect are allowed in array()?