Re: libpq object hooks

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan  writes:
>   
>> All of this is getting quite a long way from what was in the commitfest 
>> queue. Do we still want to try to get this in this cycle, or should it 
>> be marked returned to author for more work?
>>     
>
> So far I think it still falls within the category of allowing the author
> to revise his work.  I don't want to hold commitfest open waiting on
> revisions of this patch, but as long as there's still other stuff being
> worked through I don't see why they can't keep trying.
>
> Just for the record, I would really like to close this fest before
> PGCon starts.  We still have a couple more days to get it done.
>
> 			
>   

Apart from this one only two have not been claimed:

. Map Forks
. TRUNCATE TABLE with IDENTITY

cheers

andrew