Re: Terminal width for help output
От
Andrew Dunstan
Тема
Re: Terminal width for help output
Дата
Msg-id
473CB4FE.2040804@dunslane.net
Ответ на
Re: Terminal width for help output (Bruce Momjian)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Terminal width for help output Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Terminal width for help output "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: Terminal width for help output Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Terminal width for help output Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Terminal width for help output Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: Terminal width for help output Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>
Re: Terminal width for help output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Terminal width for help output "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>
Re: Terminal width for help output Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Re: Terminal width for help output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Terminal width for help output "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: Terminal width for help output Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and psql's >> \?)? I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we >> have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to? >> > > Yea, I went over with the pg_ctl --timeout parameter and had to trim a > little. I would like us to keep it <80 myself. > > +1. wrapping is annoying. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления