Re: Terminal width for help output

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Andrew Dunstan
Тема
Re: Terminal width for help output
Дата
Msg-id
473CB4FE.2040804@dunslane.net
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Terminal width for help output Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: Terminal width for help output "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: Terminal width for help output Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Terminal width for help output Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Terminal width for help output Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: Terminal width for help output Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>
Re: Terminal width for help output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Terminal width for help output "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>
Re: Terminal width for help output Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Re: Terminal width for help output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Terminal width for help output "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: Terminal width for help output Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>


Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>   
>> Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and psql's 
>> \?)?  I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we 
>> have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
>>     
>
> Yea, I went over with the pg_ctl --timeout parameter and had to trim a
> little.  I would like us to keep it <80 myself.
>
>   

+1. wrapping is annoying.

cheers

andrew

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Joshua D. Drake
Дата:
FAQ