Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 468140F6.5010200@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> (Note that COPY per se will not trigger this behavior anyway, since it >>> will act in a limited number of buffers because of the recent buffer >>> access strategy patch.) > >> Actually we dropped it from COPY, because it didn't seem to improve >> performance in the tests we ran. > > Who's "we"? AFAICS, CVS HEAD will treat a large copy the same as any > other large heapscan. Umm, I'm talking about populating a table with COPY *FROM*. That's not a heap scan at all. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: