Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Scott Marlowe
Тема
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access
Дата
Msg-id
467B0588.5080500@g2switchworks.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access Karl Wright <kwright@metacarta.com>
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:29:49PM -0400, Karl Wright wrote:
>   
>> I checked the disk picture - this is a RAID disk array with 6 drives, 
>> with a bit more than 1Tbyte total storage.  15,000 RPM.  It would be 
>> hard to get more/faster disk than that.
>>     
>
> What kind of RAID?  It's _easy_ to get faster disk that 6 drives in
> RAID5, even if they're 15,000 RPM.  The rotation speed is the least
> of your problems in many RAID implementations.

Oh, and the driver rev means a lot too.  Some older driver revisions for 
some RAID cards are very slow.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
FAQ