Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access
От
Scott Marlowe
Тема
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent
access
Дата
Msg-id
467B0588.5080500@g2switchworks.com
Ответ на
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access (Andrew Sullivan)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of
concurrent access Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of
concurrent access Karl Wright <kwright@metacarta.com>
Re: Performance query about large tables,
lots of concurrent access Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent
access "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: Performance query about large tables,
lots of concurrent access Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:29:49PM -0400, Karl Wright wrote: > >> I checked the disk picture - this is a RAID disk array with 6 drives, >> with a bit more than 1Tbyte total storage. 15,000 RPM. It would be >> hard to get more/faster disk than that. >> > > What kind of RAID? It's _easy_ to get faster disk that 6 drives in > RAID5, even if they're 15,000 RPM. The rotation speed is the least > of your problems in many RAID implementations. Oh, and the driver rev means a lot too. Some older driver revisions for some RAID cards are very slow.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата: