Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Shane Ambler
Тема
Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
Дата
Msg-id
45BA8E85.3090607@007Marketing.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches "Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>
Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Bill Moran wrote:
> I spend some time googling this and searching the Postgresql.org site, but
> I'm either not good enough with the search strings, or it's not to be found.
> 
> I'm trying to plan upgrades so that we don't upgrade needlessly, but also
> don't get caught using stuff that nobody's supporting any more.
> The FreeBSD project keeps this schedule:
> http://www.freebsd.org/security/#adv
> which is _really_ nice when talking to managers and similar people about
> when upgrades need to be scheduled.
> 
> Does the PostgreSQL project have any similar policy about EoLs?  Even just
> a simple statement like, "it is our goal to support major branches for 2
> years after release" or some such?
> 

There is no set time frame planned that I know of.

It is more a matter of users that keep the old versions alive. Some with 
large datasets on busy servers that can't allocate enough downtime to 
upgrade tend to be keeping the older versions running.

As far as I know there are some companies that support the security 
fixes being back-ported to 7.x releases and this is the only reason they 
do get updates and are still listed on the site. There is some developer 
desire to drop 7.x altogether.

v8.0 has been available for 2 years now and a common first answer to 
support questions for anything older is to upgrade.
If they are running PostgreSQL on Windows then they should be using 8.1 
at least and be encouraged to stay more up to date as the Windows 
version is still young and less tested and is getting more improvements 
with each release.

I would not suggest that you have any clients use less than 8.0 with 8.1 
preferred and 8.2 for new installs.

But as the old saying goes if it ain't broke don't fix it. If the 
version they have runs fine and fulfills their need then leave it be.


Upgrading at the same time as hardware can be a good way to go if you 
aren't interested in always having the newest version.



-- 

Shane Ambler
pgSQL@007Marketing.com

Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Paul Lambert
Дата:
От: Ron Johnson
Дата:
FAQ