Re: Context switch storm
От
Cosimo Streppone
Тема
Re: Context switch storm
Дата
Msg-id
455991B0.6070209@streppone.it
Ответ на
Re: Context switch storm (Richard Huxton)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Context switch storm creimer@brturbo.com.br
Re: Context switch storm Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: Context switch storm Cosimo Streppone <cosimo@streppone.it>
Re: Context switch storm Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: Context switch storm Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>
Re: Context switch storm Cosimo Streppone <cosimo@streppone.it>
Re: Context switch storm Cosimo Streppone <cosimo@streppone.it>
Re: Context switch storm Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>
Re: Context switch storm "Bucky Jordan" <bjordan@lumeta.com>
Re: Context switch storm "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Context switch storm "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Context switch storm "Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>
Re: Context switch storm "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Context switch storm Cosimo Streppone <cosimo@streppone.it>
Re: Context switch storm Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Re: Context switch storm creimer@brturbo.com.br
Re: Context switch storm Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Context switch storm Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: Context switch storm Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>
Re: Context switch storm Richard Troy <rtroy@ScienceTools.com>
Re: Context switch storm Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Richard Huxton wrote: > Cosimo Streppone wrote: >> Richard Huxton wrote: >> >>>> The average context switching for this server as vmstat shows is 1 >>>> but when the problem occurs it goes to 250000. >>> >> I seem to have the same exact behaviour for an OLTP-loaded 8.0.1 server > > upgrade from 8.0.1 - the most recent is 8.0.9 iirc > [...] > Are you seeing a jump in context-switching in top? You'll know when you > do - it's a *large* jump. That's the key diagnosis. Otherwise it might > simply be your configuration settings aren't ideal for that workload. > Sorry for the delay. I have logged vmstat results for the last 3 days. Max context switches figure is 20500. If I understand correctly, this does not mean a "storm", but only that the 2 Xeons are overloaded. Probably, I can do a good thing switching off the HyperThreading. I get something like 12/15 *real* concurrent processes hitting the server. I must say I lowered "shared_buffers" to 8192, as it was before. I tried raising it to 16384, but I can't seem to find a relationship between shared_buffers and performance level for this server. > Well, the client I saw it with just bought a dual-opteron server and > used their quad-Xeon for something else. However, I do remember that 8.1 > seemed better than 7.4 before they switched. Part of that might just > have been better query-planning and other efficiences though. An upgrade to 8.1 is definitely the way to go. Any 8.0 - 8.1 migration advice? Thanks. -- Cosimo
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Guy Thornley
Дата: