Re: Optimal Postgres Development Process, Software

Hi Roger,

it'd be really nice, if you could write some documentation on your 
progress somewhere.

You should include the steps you followed in a direction an what 
obstacles you mastered or which problems made you dismiss a certain system.

I guess this could prove helpful for others that want to follow.
There must be a lot who just keep using non opensource stuff because 
they had to find lots of solutions for every kind of common task.
Opensource is all about choice but a lot of choice means risking a lot 
of dead ends, too.


Roger Rasmussen schrieb:
> Ok, a summary of the suggestions so far:
> http://gambas.sourceforge.net/ (for linux)
>
> JAVA (Netbeans/Eclipse as IDE), .net, C++, Python, all have ODBC and
> can build native clients.
>
> Glade, (for gnome only?) 
> http://glade.gnome.org/
>
> or Qt (which has inbuilt  postgres support). - C++?
> http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt
>
> pgadmin3
> http://www.pgadmin.org/
>
> Rekall
> http://www.thekompany.com/products/rekall/reviews.php3?PHPSESSID=1f9af609cd5ef61aece8004fb5cf1039
> http://www.rekallrevealed.org/kbExec.py (but enable javascript if it
> is turned off!)
> Tutorial on rekall:
> http://www.linuxmuse.com/articles.php?action=section&article=33&num=1
>
> Dabo
> www.dabodev.com
>
> kexi
> http://www.kexi-project.org/wiki/wikiview/index.php?KexiComparisons
> (good list of comparisons between different access competitors)
>
> Oo.org Base
> www.openoffice.org
>
> Delphi (Pascal) $
>
> MS Access ($)
>
> ----
> psqln00b
>
>