Re: Slightly bogus regression test for contrib/dblink

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway  writes:
> 
>>I haven't really looked at the buildfarm before -- I might be blind, but 
>>I couldn't figure out how to see the regression.diff file.
> 
> It's on the cited page, if you scroll down far enough.

OK, I'm officially blind (so much for that lasik work I had done ;-)), I 
had scrolled right on past the diff the first time.
> It looks to me like the diffs are consistent with the idea that the> test is using a copy of dblink that predates this patch ... do you> agree? If so, anyone have an idea how that could happen?  I thought> we'd fixed all the rpath problems, and anyway osprey wasn't failing> like this before today.

I would think that the diffs would be significantly larger if that were 
the case. In fact, when was PG_MODULE_MAGIC first made mandatory?

Joe