Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Markus Schaber
Тема
Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?
Дата
Msg-id
42233CDA.3030407@logi-track.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>
Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Hi, Matthew,

Matthew T. O'Connor schrieb:

> The version of pg_autovacuum that I submitted for 8.0 could be
> instructed "per table" but it didn't make the cut.  Aside from moved out
> of contrib and integrated into the backend, per table autovacuum
> settings is probably the next highest priority.

What was the reason for non-acceptance?

Is it available as a standalone project?


Markus
-- 
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios@logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Tom Arthurs
Дата:
Сообщение: PG block sizes
От: Matthew T. O'Connor
Дата:
FAQ