Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?
От
Markus Schaber
Тема
Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ?
Дата
Msg-id
42233CDA.3030407@logi-track.com
Ответ на
Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? (Matthew T. O'Connor)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>
Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Hi, Matthew, Matthew T. O'Connor schrieb: > The version of pg_autovacuum that I submitted for 8.0 could be > instructed "per table" but it didn't make the cut. Aside from moved out > of contrib and integrated into the backend, per table autovacuum > settings is probably the next highest priority. What was the reason for non-acceptance? Is it available as a standalone project? Markus -- markus schaber | dipl. informatiker logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53 mailto:schabios@logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления