Re: BUG: pgIndex.cpp

Dave Page wrote:

> Did you get a chance to look at this? It seems to me that the quick and
> dirty solution is to wrap the index->iSetxxx calls in an 'if (index)',
> however I'm not entirely convinced that is safe given that it's possible
> to return a null index pointer to the caller (which without significant
> trawling through code I may not find all instances of).

I don't see the point catching this beyond an assert. A sane pgsql will 
never return contype != p, u, or NULL unless system tables are corrupted.

Regards,
Andreas