Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig
Дата
Msg-id
4173.929632234@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig (Bruce Momjian)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian writes: >> Then we'd better fix the underlying problem. We can't change >> RELSEG_SIZE for a minor release, unless you want to give up the >> principle of not forcing initdb at minor releases. > Why can't we increase it? Consider a 1.5-gig table. 6.5 will store it as one gig in file "table", one-half gig in file "table.1". Now recompile with larger RELSEG_SIZE. The file manager will now expect to find all blocks of the relation in file "table", and will never go to "table.1" at all. Presto, you lost a bunch of data. Bottom line is just as it says in the config.h comments: you can't change either BLCKSZ or RELSEG_SIZE without doing initdb. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления