Re: 7.4 changes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Andrew Dunstan
Тема
Re: 7.4 changes
Дата
Msg-id
417264CF.9080304@dunslane.net
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Why we still see some reports of "could not access transaction status" Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access transaction status" Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access transaction Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>
Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 7.4 changes Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: 7.4 changes Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: 7.4 changes Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 7.4 changes Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: 7.4 changes Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: 7.4 changes Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: 7.4 changes Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>


Tom Lane wrote:

>
>If anyone has any pending 7.4 fixes, getting them in in the next
>few days would be a Good Plan.
>
>  
>


Do we want to backport tighter security for plperl? In particular, 
insisting on Safe.pm >= 2.09 and removing the :base_io set of ops?

cheers

andrew

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: additional GCC warnings
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 7.4 changes
FAQ