Re: Unit testing
От
Andrew Dunstan
Тема
Re: Unit testing
Дата
Msg-id
416A9CEF.4080903@dunslane.net
Ответ на
Re: Unit testing (Neil Conway)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Unit testing Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>
Re: Unit testing "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: Unit testing Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Unit testing Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: Unit testing Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Unit testing Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Re: Unit testing Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: Unit testing Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unit testing Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>
Re: Unit testing Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unit testing Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: Unit testing Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Unit testing Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>
Neil Conway wrote: > > >> 3. Unit testing frameworks are best suited to component-based >> architectures, ISTM. I'm not sure that one would fit Postgres very well. > > > Can you elaborate? > > With objects that are relatively standalone, you can instantiate them easily and plug them into a testing framework. The more interdependent things are, the harder it is. I think a concrete example of what you're suggesting would help a lot. Pick one small area, show the changes needed, and how you would use the testing setup. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления