Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> writes:
> int64_t is a C99 data type that hasn't existed prior to recent
> versions of gcc, but is quite valid/correct. I'd think that int64_t
> support should be fudged on platforms where in64_t isn't defined as
> long long.
We have int64 defined (and well tested) already; I see no reason to muck
with it.
regards, tom lane