Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning
От
Joe Conway
Тема
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning
Дата
Msg-id
4067B8DC.8070205@joeconway.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning work Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning work Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning work Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning work Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Neil Conway wrote: > On 28-Mar-04, at 8:32 PM, Joe Conway wrote: >> > + * XXX does this percentage need to be user-configurable? >> >> ...but I think the answer to the above is yes. > > Is this really a parameter that we can expect administrators to be able > to understand and tune very effectively? I think so. For one thing, if it were user-controllable, then it could be turned off for backward compatible behavior (i.e. 0 means no fuzz). Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата: