Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]
От
Andrew Dunstan
Тема
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]
Дата
Msg-id
404CE327.5070901@dunslane.net
Ответ на
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] (Rod Taylor)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] "Clark C. Evans" <cce@clarkevans.com>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER] "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Rod Taylor wrote: >On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 14:46, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > >>Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >> >> >>>Another problem is that pg_description is per-database, while >>>pg_user/group are global for all databases. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>databases are also per cluster, but we have comments on those. >> >>Could we keep the user/group comments in those tables instead of in >>pg_description? >> >> > >Comments longer than ~7k would need a toast table. At the moment, toast >tables don't work on a global basis. > > > Well, presumably we don't want to keep their life story ;-) I was just thinking out loud I guess - I see there are wrinkles I hadn't considered. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
