Re: make installcheck on non-default ports

Tom Lane wrote:
> I think there is something wrong with your setup procedures, because
> I've never needed such.  (I've corresponded with Joe off-list about
> this --- maybe we can produce a FAQ about the right way to do it once
> the dust settles.)

Yup, got it.

> AFAICS this would defeat the documented behavior of being able to set
> PGHOST/PGPORT in the environment to control which postmaster "make
> installcheck" will speak to.  So, yeah, I think it's a bad idea.

OK. I'll see about playing with the scripts you sent me.

Thanks,

Joe