Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results.
От
Shridhar Daithankar
Тема
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results.
Дата
Msg-id
3F4CA308.15268.327E2C9@localhost
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com>
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com>
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com>
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>
On 26 Aug 2003 at 8:34, Jeff wrote: > Could it just be that the sun sucks? (And for the record - same schema, > nearly same query (modified for datetime syntax) on informix runs in 3 > seconds). My impression is IPC on sun has higher initial latency than linux. But given that you also ran the tests with multiple connections and results were of similar pattern, I can't help to conclude that postgresql has to find a way to have faste IPC on solaris. I know I will be flamed for repeatedly making this suggestion. But what does tests with sparc linux on same machine yield? Bye Shridhar -- untold wealth, n.: What you left out on April 15th.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления