Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway  writes:
>>Included in the patch, I changed SQL language functions so that they 
>>could be declared with and use polymorphic types.
> 
> I'm not convinced that will work ... in particular, does the parsetree
> get fixed correctly when a SQL function is inlined?
> 

I'll try it out. What's the easiest way to be sure the function get's 
inlined?

In any case, it's easy enough to rip that part out of the patch -- it 
just would have been a lot more painful to test without it.

Joe