Re: array support patch phase 1 patch

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway  writes:
> 
>>The aggregates hacking was a bit convoluted by the desire to support 
>>polymorphic aggregates using polymorphic functions. You end up with many 
>>possible states, some of which are invalid because they don't provide 
>>enough context to resolve the polymorphic types. Any suggestions?
> 
> I think we'd be better off leaving that out till we understand it a
> little better, then ...

I'm reasonably sure I covered the bases on it. Did you find behavior you 
didn't like?

In any case, I think we ought to allow polymorphic functions to be used 
in aggregates. Life is simpler if the aggregate uses well defined data 
types.

Joe