Re: RE: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance

Vadim Mikheev wrote:
> 
> > It may be that WAL has changed the rollback
> > time-characteristics to worse than pre-wal ?
> 
> Nothing changed ... yet. And in future rollbacks
> of read-only transactions will be as fast as now,
> anyway.

What about rollbacks of a bunch uf inserts/updates/deletes?

I remember a scenario where an empty table was used by several 
backends for gathering report data, and when the report is 
done they will rollback to keep the table empty.

Should this kind of usage be replaced in the future by 
having backend id as a key and then doing delete by that 
key in the end ?

--------------
Hannu