Re: [HACKERS] fsynch of pg_log write..

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Vadim Mikheev
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] fsynch of pg_log write..
Дата
Msg-id
3776CE40.294AFFD@krs.ru
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: [HACKERS] fsynch of pg_log write.. Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 wrote:
> 
>         Vadim wrote:
> > Right way is just set some flag in WriteBuffer()/WriteNoReleaseBuffer()
> > and don't do
> >
> > FlushBufferPool
> > TransactionIdCommit
> > FlushBufferPool
> >
> > at all when this flag is not setted.
> >
> While this is even much better for select only transactions
> it will still do the second flush for writers.
> This flush is not needed for those, that are only interested
> in consistency, and don't care if the last transaction before
> system/backend crash is lost.
> It can actually really only be the very last transaction reported
> ok to any client, that is rolled back, since all other xactions
> will be flushed by this same first FlushBufferPool
> (since BufferSync currently flushes all dirty Pages).
> So IMHO a switch to avoid the second FlushBufferPool           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> would still be useful, even with this suggested fix.

I didn't object this.

Vadim

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: sean dreilinger
Дата:
От: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
FAQ