Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Don Baccus
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Дата
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.19990605191929.00dd4e84@mail.pacifier.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@trust.ee>)
Список pgsql-hackers
At 11:51 PM 6/5/99 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:

>It is not a genuine bug (as it only slows thong down instead of 
>getting wrong results), but still a misfeature.

Well, it depends on how one defines "bug", I suppose :)  In the
strictest sense you're correct, yet for real world use, particularly
in environments with high traffic, it's a killer.  

>It is most likely an ancient quickfix for some execution path that 
>failed to set the dirty mark when it should have.

Yep, I remember this from the earlier conversation, too.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Don Baccus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Следующее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6