Re: [PATCH] Feature improvement for CLOSE, FETCH, MOVE tab completion
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Feature improvement for CLOSE, FETCH, MOVE tab completion |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28d43417-af7f-c3b8-da19-189a50d2d85c@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Feature improvement for CLOSE, FETCH, MOVE tab completion (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Feature improvement for CLOSE, FETCH, MOVE tab completion
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-01-05 10:56, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> BTW according to the documentation, the options of DECLARE statement
> (BINARY, INSENSITIVE, SCROLL, and NO SCROLL) are order-sensitive.
>
> DECLARE name [ BINARY ] [ INSENSITIVE ] [ [ NO ] SCROLL ]
> CURSOR [ { WITH | WITHOUT } HOLD ] FOR query
>
> But I realized that these options are actually order-insensitive. For
> instance, we can declare a cursor like:
>
> =# declare abc scroll binary cursor for select * from pg_class;
> DECLARE CURSOR
>
> The both parser code and documentation has been unchanged from 2003.
> Is it a documentation bug?
According to the SQL standard, the ordering of the cursor properties is
fixed. Even if the PostgreSQL parser offers more flexibility, I think
we should continue to encourage writing the clauses in the standard order.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: