Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2849149.1611974668@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> Broad trends have made it easier to write portable C code, but that
> doesn't apply to 32-bit machines, I imagine. Including even the
> extremely low power 32-bit chips that are not yet fully obsolete, like
> the Raspberry Pi Zero's chip.
Meh. To my mind, the most interesting aspects of different hardware
platforms for our purposes are
* alignment sensitivity (particularly, is unaligned access expensive);
* spinlock support, and after that various other atomic instructions;
* endianness
Pointer width is interesting, but really it's a solved problem
compared to these.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: