Re: string function - "format" function proposal
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: string function - "format" function proposal |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 26221.1283780875@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: string function - "format" function proposal (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Re: string function - "format" function proposal |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2010/9/6 Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>:
>> Which should we use for such purposes? Consistent behavior is
>> obviously preferred. Boolean type might be the only type that
>> is converted to different representation in typoutput or cast-to-test,
>> but we should consider to have boolean-specific hardwired code,
>> or cast all types to text instead of output functions.
> Personally I prefer casting to text -
No, you need to use the I/O functions. Not every type is guaranteed to
have a cast to text.
> iit allows some later
> customizations. And it's more consistent with || operator.
I don't buy either of those arguments.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: