Re: WAL format
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL format |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 23971.1260217709@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | WAL format (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WAL format
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: > In particular I wonder why we bother with the page headers. A much > simpler format would be: > - get rid of page headers, except for the header at the beginning of > each WAL segment > - get rid of continuation records > - at the end of WAL segment, when there's not enough space to write the > next WAL record, always write an XLOG SWITCH record to fill the rest of > the segment. What do you do with a WAL record that doesn't fit in a segment? (They do exist.) I don't think you can eliminate continuation records. You could maybe use them only at segment boundaries but I doubt that makes things any simpler than they are now. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: