On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 11:11:37AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 06.09.22 08:27, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:57:53AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > > > I think renumbering this makes sense. We could just leave the comment
> > > > as is if we don't come up with a better wording.
> > >
> > > +1, I see no need to change the comment. We just need to establish
> > > the precedent that values within the GUC_UNIT_MEMORY field can be
> > > chosen sequentially.
> >
> > +1.
>
> committed without the comment change
Thank you