Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements
Дата
Msg-id
20210514120942.GA22344@momjian.us
Ответ на
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: compute_query_id and pg_stat_statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:26:23AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I then tried a really dumb xor'ing implementation, and > that gives me a slowdown of 2.2%. This could undoubtedly > be improved on further, say by unrolling the loop or > processing multiple bytes at once. One problem with it > is that I suspect it will tend to concentrate the entropy > into the third/fourth and seventh/eighth bytes of the > accumulator, since so many of the fields being jumbled > are 4-byte or 8-byte fields with most of the entropy in > their low-order bits. Probably that could be improved > with a bit more thought -- say, an extra bump of the > nextbyte pointer after each field. > > Anyway, I think that what we have here is quite an inferior > implementation, and we can do better with some more thought. Considering what even a simple query has to do, I am still baffled why such a computation takes ~2%, though it obviously does since you have confirmed that figure. -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата: